“Can I see a show of hands from anyone here that didn’t make a mistake or do something they regretted at 22.”
In our day and age public speaking through videos such as TED talks, or interview shows, or even news stories, has become a forum. These videos provide a way for celebrities or those who are in the public eye to share their stories and clear the air from gossip, fake news, and lies the public has created. Monica Lewinsky is a perfect example of this. After her scandal leaked in 1998, the public took action in publicly humiliating her through the internet and newspapers. After staying out of the public eye for almost a decade, she returned, speaking out about her mistakes and giving herself a platform to share not only her stories, but the stories of others who had to bare humiliation exactly as she did.
Although it it is brave for those like Lewinsky to speak out, questions can arise. Some wonder just how affect this is for the public or if it is affective only to that of there person speaking. In this blogpost we will give our personal opinions on the pros and cons of these thoughts.
What awareness are these public speakings and announcements really bringing to the public?
Pros: In the case of Lewinsky TED talk she was able to use this platform as a way to bring awareness to the public on just how hurtful the newspaper articles, and internet posts about her personal life were to her and how they directly affected her lifestyle. Lewinsky mentioned in this speech that her mother was often afraid of leaving her alone to shower, or scared to let her leave her home. For the public to hear this can be extremely eye opening. Many when they hurt those on the internet, especially celebrities, they don’t often realize that there is a person behind the screen that they are affecting. Lewinsky in this TED talk brings up the case of a college freshman who was secretly webcamed by his roommate while being intimate with another man. Just like in Lewinsky’s case, the internet took immediate notice to this case, ridiculing the student and shaming him publicly. The importance of this case is that this student took his life at the age of only 18 years old. The fact that Lewinsky spoke out, not only about her personal experience in the public eye, but about Tyler’s death, creates room for change and awareness of what is going on behind the scenes of the internet, an important lesson many still need to learn.
Cons: Although many of these celebrity speeches or interviews have brought light to important subjects, such as cyberbullying, some have only made more of a public platform for themselves. It is hard sometimes to distinguish between whether by speaking out they are trying to better society or better their personal reputation. One example of this was that of The Streisand Effect. In this case Barbra Streisand was trying to get pictures of her home that were taken without her knowledge off the internet for privacy. Taking this case all the way to court, the internet and public soon became aware and it caused for both her and her home to get even more attention and publicity than before. These examples show that although celebrities and those in the public eye, try to recompense for wrongdoings or being exposed to the public, many times it just causes more of an issue for them in the long run.
Questions we leave for you to think about next time you see a tabloid, or read an article about a celebrity scandal:
- What is the individual doing to better themselves after this instance?
- What are the public and those on the internet saying about this individual and why?
- Has the individual spoken out about their case to the public? If so what did they address or platform their speech around?
- What stance do you take? Do you believe the individual choosing to speak out on behalf of themselves help them, or do you think silence is sometimes the best answer?